Unfortunately I have been saying that since I played there... I saw/thought that when i was recruited and talked to... To me that also comes down to the school, as soon as ISU starts to think they have a dominate team(s) and try to promote more sports events and everything that goes along with it. That is when we will start to see things change.. I have been a cyclone for pretty much all of my life and "to me" the school has always portrayed them selves to more proud of the academics and Diversity,,, with sports that are a little less than average... instead of going the other way like most of the dominate bcs schools....
Sports is the money maker, so it would be smart to put athletics first IMO.I really don't see a problem with Iowa State picturing itself as an academic institution first and foremost.
Sports is the money maker, so it would be smart to put athletics first IMO.
Sports usually loses money at most schools which are not Ohio State, Texas, Michigan, or USC. ISU's sports programs are not self supporting.Sports is the money maker, so it would be smart to put athletics first IMO.
Sports is the money maker, so it would be smart to put athletics first IMO.
I really don't see a problem with Iowa State picturing itself as an academic institution first and foremost.
I get a buzz out of most of the people that will put a spin on anything and everything. You can say drink the cyclone koolaid or whatever. Yes, I'm a cyclone fan, but not sold on this years recruiting. Say what you want about ratings of players and stars, but the better teams have the better ratings and more stars. When the average recruit is less than 2 for an average that says a lot. There is no way we can spin it. We have the worst Big 12 recruiting class by far. Couple that with last years class and we can truly be looking up from the bottom for a lot of years to come. Oh by the way, I think last years class was better than this class. So are recruits not buying the hipe of the new coach after the last season. I think the answer is that we are seeing no stars or two star recruits that are commiting now and some decommits. Not a good sign. I hope we have a truly good staff that coach their *** off as we will need it. It all boils down to the old question what comes first to turn a program around. Good recruits or winning with good coaching with less talent???? The schedule should help, but if you notice the teams we will be playing for the next two years are having way better recruiting classes than we are. Plus, we don't have an oil man giving millions to upgrade the facilities. Another point is that the North is all of a sudden 'tuff'. Pick the worst North team and compare our recruiting classes....... Pick the worst team in the South for that matter and compare our recruiting classes......It is going to get harder and harder to steal a win from any team in the Big 12, MAC, and or from the state of Iowa. I know this is a football thread, but I see similar things happening in basketball. Seems like we have to start over each year. Loose Jiri and Rashon next year and ??????? Lucca better be damn good......
I dont think your understaning what im saying... obviously you need to worry about the academics...
That comment makes me sad. Iowa State is not an entertainment company. Universities exist to solve real problems that people face on this Earth. Without them, life would not exist the way you know it today.
If sports is the real revenue generator then what has it produced for the university? Look at the Oklahoma's, Florida's, and LSU's of the world and tell me how much revenue from sports has been extended to the university, itself.
Universities are not money makers, they are expensive money consumers, both academics and athletics. That is why our gifts are important.
Then why do I pay $27,000 a year to go get an education.Universities are not money makers
Exactly. If it was between Florida and ISU for I would have gone to Florida in a heartbeat. Having good athletics bring in a lot more money than people might expect.Believing that a university's academic side does not benefit from strong athletics is foolish. It may not give dollars to the university, but there are other ways it can help.
Geoffroy is an academic. That is his priority, and he's made it no secret. He also understands that the numbers don't lie, and strong athletics can help a schools notoriety, bring in more potential students (tuition $$$) and benefit academics. You should ask him if strong athletic programs are beneficial to the schools academic goals. I bet he'll tell you yes without hesitating.