Could the Cy-Hawk series be played every other year

cyhiphopp

Moderator
Staff member
Jan 9, 2009
33,275
14,550
113
Ankeny
ISU and Iowa fans are both delusional on who they’d actually be able to replace that game with. ISU isn’t going to get Wisconsin or Minnesota to agree to a home/home nor is Iowa going to get Oklahoma or Notre Dame like they think they would. Even if either school could get a high profile game, itd take 7+ years to get it on schedule and who knows what would change in that time.

This seems like the biggest problem with either side wanting to get rid of the series to schedule different opponents.
At best you are going to get a P5 also ran most years. The only schools that annually schedule top tier P5 non-con games are teams like Alabama, Georgia, tOSU, and maybe Oklahoma/Texas.

Neither Iowa or ISU are going to be able to get GREAT home and homes scheduled that often. And neither ISU or "mighty" Iowa have the clout to GET the huge matchups. Nobody at Notre Dame is saying they really need to go to Iowa City and invite the vaunted Hokeyes to South Bend. Same with Alabama. They are throwing Wisconsin a bone because they usually win the B1G West and that series is 6 years out. They might do something similar with a team like Iowa, but it's less likely, and series like that are uncommon for teams like Iowa.

Best case scenario, you schedule one huge home and home or neutral site game with say, Georgia. That's one or two games, likely 5 years out. Congratulations, you gave up a proven money maker in the CyHawk game to get one big matchup every 4 or 5 years. The rest of the years you are going to get, at best, a P5 team in the second tier of their conference. You may get a decent crowd to show up for those games, but it's not going to be as good as the CyHawk crowd, and there's no guaranteeing that whatever team you schedule is going to remain in the second tier of their conference for the next 3 years until you play.

It's a "Be careful what you wish for" scenario. Yes there is some fatigue playing CyHawk every year, and the prospect of playing a big SEC team instead sounds great. But you aren't going to get those teams every year.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Messi

Acylum

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2006
14,326
15,011
113
We need to drop UNI. And I have no hate for UNI, just looking at it from our perspective.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: weR138

CyberJJJ

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 19, 2006
4,066
3,362
113
Johnston, IA
2 points battle:
1) The game is ALWAYS a sellout and keeps all the revenue in-state. Why mess with that?
2) Every school wants maximum home games for revenue. As ISU/IA is a home and home series, every other year that is an away out of conference game. While either team could schedule another P5 team to a home and home, neither wants 2 away games out of conference in the same year, so this series does in fact limit some financial flexibility in another home/home series.
 

ForeverIowan

Well-Known Member
Feb 23, 2013
1,770
3,123
113
Let them leave and play Missouri, Arizona State and Boston College. Elite programs aren't going to schedule home and home with Iowa. They are a middle of the pack Big Ten program.
 

CyTwins

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2010
80,179
65,792
113
Ankeny
No we didn't. JP is no where near that stupid to schedule a home and home with Arkansas in lieu of Iowa.

No JP realizes playing a Big Ten West team is a lose/lose situation for us from a national perception so he wanted to schedule an SEC team instead
 
  • Useful
Reactions: trouw2112

Hawkmi

Well-Known Member
Oct 9, 2013
1,358
2,046
113
39
No JP realizes playing a Big Ten West team is a lose/lose situation for us from a national perception so he wanted to schedule an SEC team instead
tenor.gif
 

cyhiphopp

Moderator
Staff member
Jan 9, 2009
33,275
14,550
113
Ankeny
2 points battle:
1) The game is ALWAYS a sellout and keeps all the revenue in-state. Why mess with that?
2) Every school wants maximum home games for revenue. As ISU/IA is a home and home series, every other year that is an away out of conference game. While either team could schedule another P5 team to a home and home, neither wants 2 away games out of conference in the same year, so this series does in fact limit some financial flexibility in another home/home series.

If you alternate which home and home is away then you could make it work. The years that Iowa is an away game, you get the Home side of your other series, and vice versa.
It makes it harder to schedule of course and if you're trying to get an elite series against a top tier school you probably don't have that kind of negotiating power at ISU or Iowa.

Iowa doesn't schedule a second P5 series, not because they can't, but because they know it's hard to play 11 P5 games a season, even in the B1G West. They would rather put up with fans complaining about a boring home schedule, but still buying tickets, than out or shut up against another P5 noncon team.
So Iowa fans just complain that it's all ISU's fault that they can't schedule Notre Dame and Alabama, which would probably never happen, or at least not as often as they think it would.
 

heitclone

Well-Known Member
Jun 21, 2009
16,623
14,419
113
45
Way up there
I know the "fake ID" stuff from Cowherd a few years back really got to Hawk fans, a few that I work with, blamed that entirely on the ISU game and how it keeps them from playing good teams.
 

cytor

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 20, 2011
8,136
12,996
113
Can somebody tell me why Iowa has to play 7 home games every year? Are they that cash strapped?
Is this common practice in P5 prgrams. I always thought every team should play 6 home and 6 road games period.