Sure. 1) If team ranked #1 beats team ranked #2 by 30 points, it doesn't automatically mean that team #2 isn't still the second best team in the country. It just means that team #1 was 30 points better than them that day and should still be ranked #1. Since you are all spending so much time trying to convince me that the results of an individual game are less important than the weight of an overall resume, I would argue that KU's overall resume deserves to have them ranked higher than they are since it is much more impressive than some of the teams ranked above them. 2) ISU's overall resume, given the limited sample size at this point in the season, is marginally better than Maryland's overall. I would understand why a voter would vote ISU higher than Maryland despite the head to head win. I would also certainly not think it is ridiculous for a person to say that the head to head win means more to them when they voted and put Maryland ahead of ISU. There simply isn't enough of a difference in the resumes for it to be ridiculous considering that they did actually beat them.