How many times does a "batted down" pass actually go towards the ground? It usually goes sideways, away from the group of people trying to catch it. 99.9% of the time that ball falls to the ground. **** happens.The term is bat it down , rather than bat it away, or a reason.
Unless you are a professional athlete or a Navy Seal, who train and train for pressure situations, or one of those few people whose DNA is just plain written to handle pressure, most of us are more prone to make mistakes under pressure. Even pro athletes "choke". When you are always playing from behind, you are always under that pressure, and your opponent never is. It doesn't surprise me that ISU's offense makes a lot of mistakes at crucial times in tight games, because they are so many times in "really need to score here" situations . The players are college kids, not Navy Seals.I'd like to think we'd sneak in one W in those games, oh well. Maybe if we had more practice at being aggressive instead of using UNI games as pillow fights?
But alas, I agree. And this is the problem with an offensive staff (and CMC) that scoreboard watch. We lack urgency in games, and in season. We have 5 seasons of playing "close' with nearly anyone, whether it be high scoring, low scoring, Drake/UNI, Clemson/OU/Ok St.
Being easy to defend is not ball control. Doing what you can do well enough to keep the ball or score is ball control. When we get behind, we do more of the latter. As we stumble thought September, we get urgency.
Is this a UNI bump?There was another team on the field that didn't want us to win. From what I hear, that other team has a pretty good defense.
By a 4 year starting P5 player? Nearly all the time. This is football 101. And when they don't they get chewed out and criticized for making bone-headed plays.How many times does a "batted down" pass actually go towards the ground? It usually goes sideways, away from the group of people trying to catch it. 99.9% of the time that ball falls to the ground. **** happens.
Okay, now this seems like hyperbole. And these guys better be training for pressure situations. This is P5 football. Also, the opponent is also under pressure. To say they never are is blatantly false. We can argue whether it is more or less, but when it is a one score game, the don't choke factor is very present on both sides.Unless you are a professional athlete or a Navy Seal, who train and train for pressure situations, or one of those few people whose DNA is just plain written to handle pressure, most of us are more prone to make mistakes under pressure. Even pro athletes "choke". When you are always playing from behind, you are always under that pressure, and your opponent never is. It doesn't surprise me that ISU's offense makes a lot of mistakes at crucial times in tight games, because they are so many times in "really need to score here" situations . The players are college kids, not Navy Seals.
Stops until the ball gets spotted. We had receivers downfield so they would need to run back or we substitute and let Clemson take their time substituting. Looking at 7-10 seconds probably.Doesn't the clock stop on a slide/first down?
Either way ball security issues on the scramble were always an issue and that was no exception.
I would wager a lot of money that I will never again see a QB scramble for the first, attempt to extend the play when 4 yards beyond the line to gain, only to fumble and recover back behind the original LOS to turn it over.
Okay, now this seems like hyperbole. And these guys better be training for pressure situations. This is P5 football. Also, the opponent is also under pressure. To say they never are is blatantly false. We can argue whether it is more or less, but when it is a one score game, the don't choke factor is very present on both sides.
We're bad in details throughout the game, not just the end. That's often why we're behind. Also, risk/reward tolerance of the offense increases in those moments, while the defense risk goes down. There should be less mistakes by the defense- little to do with "pressure" inequality.
Because hes 2-5 this year. Cant imagine any season other than last looks great either
Well, no doubt it is best to be ahead 7 or more in those situations helps. Up 6 or less is different. If you're up by 6 with little time left, there is just as much pressure on the defense. So I still don't see pressure delta coming into play. But even up 7, guys choke in those moments, from the "don't screw up" pressure. When up three, is there no pressure on a FT shooter to put them up 4?I'm sure the college kids are training for pressure situations, but they have limited time to devote to that training. Supposedly, they are also doing classwork and working towards a degree. Pro athletes are training full-time...its their job. And some of them do it for years.
The way ISU's games seem to often end up, ISU's offense should be spending quite a bit of time practicing 2-minute offense. Do they do that? I don't know.
Relative to ISU's offense, I don't think ISU's defense makes a lot of mistakes. I don't disagree that the offense struggles with details throughout the game. But there seems to be an expectation that an offense can just turn off the mistakes off after falling behind and come up with game-saving drives game after game.
I would have loved to see Clemson's "they don't let me throw downfield" QB trying to make up a 14-point deficit (or even a 7-point deficit) against ISU's defense. But, he never really had to make any "pressure" plays because he was playing from 3, 2, and 1-posessions leads for most of the second half.
Can't say for sure on TDs vs FGs, but our offensive points per drive (adjusted for "garbage time," which doesn't effect us but can effect other teams) was 2.83 which put us as the 25th most efficient offense this year. For comparison, the #1 team Ohio State scored 4.01 OPPD and the median was 2.22 OPPD. Our Net PPD (Offensive PPD - Defensive PPD) was ranked 16th at 0.99. The #1 NPPD team was Georgia at 2.86, and the median was 0.11.Well, no doubt it is best to be ahead 7 or more in those situations helps. Up 6 or less is different. If you're up by 6 with little time left, there is just as much pressure on the defense. So I still don't see pressure delta coming into play. But even up 7, guys choke in those moments, from the "don't screw up" pressure. When up three, is there no pressure on a FT shooter to put them up 4?
What is our TD per possession rate? A 40% 3P shooter is pretty good. But I would not want to be down 3 and having them shoot with little time left regardless of pressure- it is a bad spot to be in. And relatively speaking, our offense is more like a 34% shooter imo.
That batted ball INT came when 13-6 midway through the 3rd. When that's happening, it is hard to see mistakes later being due to pressure. Purdy just makes mistakes.
The coaches don't help matters with the way they use their timeouts and the lack of urgency in between offensive plays.
Sometimes a good decisions don't go well and sometimes bad decisions work out anyway.
Stops until the ball gets spotted. We had receivers downfield so they would need to run back or we substitute and let Clemson take their time substituting. Looking at 7-10 seconds probably.
The Fightin' Gundys did it to us (and others) this year. Milk the substitution time to run down at least the play clock, so you have less time to motion around the offense. For an offense like ours that motions and realigns a lot, it can cause problems.For example, Clemson QBs horrible decision to throw a fluttering pass that should have been picked off, but ends up as a completion for a 1st down.
The Cyclones have used this strategy a couple times this season, and I think it was used again yesterday, but the refs stopped the clock toward the end of the 1st half when it should've kept running. Heacock was talking to them at half, I assumed about that ruling.
we literally have the anti hurry up offense. It’s brutal. Has to be the worst 2 minute drill I’ve seen
Ah, the old "I have nothing to add to the convo but I don't like it so I'm gonna accuse someone of being a bad person" argument. If you have anything real to add to the conversation please do.Before you start a thread to anonymously criticize someone who has given absolutely everything to his team and his coaches, I recommend you go look in the mirror. Better yet, click on your user name look at your own reaction score to your posts.
Ah, the old "I have nothing to add to the convo but I don't like it so I'm gonna accuse someone of being a bad person" argument. If you have anything real to add to the conversation please do.